Is Generative AI Software's Econo Offering?
In 2025, many are wondering, "Will AI take my job?" If you want to answer this question, there's an easy test, "Is it okay for me to frequently be wrong?" If the answer is yes, AI may take your job.
If your job requires you to be right most of the time, AI isn't ready to replace you. Ironically, what we've grown comfortable expecting of computer software may not be true with AI. The software we've known is logical to a fault. AI is capable of logical contradiction, even hypocrisy. It's a statistical engine that confidently offers the most likely answer given what it's aware of in the moment.
Unlike technology we've used to date, it's not deterministic. It can't be relied upon to provide the same, correct answer reach time. Consequently, when the correct answer is required, it needs either a deterministic system or a human expert there to check its work.
For fields where emotion is the product, it's difficult to say what wrong is. Art, entertainment, politics all are in the business of influencing. Moving an audience happens via pathos. Here right and wrong are less consequential than emotional impact. While AI lacks human relate-ability, we humans are pretty comfortable anthropomorphizing things.
Software shops are still predominantly focused on building deterministic software. Leaders are highly interested in doing so more efficiently. Businesses are actively exploring how to make use of these new tools to optimize performance. While this is yielding results, businesses should also be asking themselves, "Do I still need a deterministic system?"
It may be constructive to think of generative AI as a general purpose software. It's not the luxury option. It's often wrong. It's a Jack of All Trades. If that's enough, it's probably a lot cheaper than building and maintaining a deterministic system and its team.
Comments
Post a Comment